QUICK SOCIAL DESIGN OKCUPID

Cross here if this question matters to you

https://theblog.okcupid.com/the-best-questions-for-a-first-date-dba6adaa9df2

译：如果你想知道你与你的约会对象是否有一致的政治倾向，那么你可以问ta，你希望你生命中的人是更简单还是更复杂？通过OkCupid的数据调查，我们发现倾向复杂性的人更多倾向自由党（Liberal），反之则是保守党。

*    *    *

 

Nowadays looking for in a relationship or a partner through dating Apps is common and trendy. And OkCupid App is specifically calculating user's matches rate though few questionaries, i.e. Politically, which are more important to you right now. Moreover, users could also emphasise the importance of the question and set up their tendency answers from the others. While chatting freely, the system also provided their match's percentages and detailed questionnaire answers, as professional job interviews.

Rethinking of these social based questions, it's very interesting that how they select these questions, why it matters to a relationship and what kind of politics, law, religions questions should be included as an important part of a dating situation and so on. This toilet paper issue is trying to redefine our social design relationships in a similar way, by collecting the detailed answers towards different respects and see how much common ideology we have inside the studio, whether if we can triggering a break or a deeper harmony.

如今，通过交友Apps寻找一段关系或伴侣是很常见的。因而也出现了像OkCupid这类专门计算用户的匹配率的App，通过为数不多的问题，系统将用户双方的答案评估匹配，就像专业的求职面试一样。此外，用户还可以强调问题的重要性，并设置自己的倾向性答案，例如政治上，哪个对你现在更重要。软件的博客中也会有一些初次约会的问题指南，将政治性问题隐晦在了一些日常问答之中。

这期厕纸读物便是回应这些预设问题，思考这些问题为什么会对一段关系很重要，什么样的政治、法律、宗教问题应该作为约会情况的重要组成部分等等。希望类似的方式重新思考社会设计系同僚之间的内部关系，通过收集不同方面的详细答案，看看我们工作室内部有多少共同的意识形态，是否能引发断裂或更深的和谐。

 

 

Q1 - What is SOCIAL DESIGN?

  • Situation a. Explain it to your family I.e. grandma, fiancee, niece..
  • Situation b. Explain it during your 1st Tinder date…please assume that your partner(s) is(are) absent…
  • Situation c. Explain it during the job interview..
  • Open answer..


“For me SD is a process of design, or a process you can make something changes."

"Project Management."

"social work, kind of."

“Common ideology. Design with social efficacy. They are usually processes or happenings so to say.“

Q1 - 什么是SOCIAL DESIGN（社会设计）？

情景a.向你的家人解釋，例如奶奶、未婚妻、侄女 。

情景b.在你的第一次Tinder約會時解釋...請假設你的伴侶不在 。

情景c.在面试时解释 

调查答案：
"对我来说，SD是一个设计的过程，或者说是一个你可以让一些东西改变的过程。"

"项目管理"

"一种社会工作"

"共同的意识形态。具有社会效应的设计。它们通常都是过程或者说发生中的事情。"

 

Q2 - What kind of relationship will you define with SD studio?

  • Level a. I fancy it, and I appreciate the part of…
  • Level b. We are working together, and it’s complicated in terms of…
  • Level c. I’m struggling, because…
  • Level d. I’m imagining our break up.


"Level a. Culture exchange."

"Level a. Exchanging creative through with beautiful humor, yet it smells in the studio."

"Level c. I’m struggling, because the studio is not only for me."

"Level b. We are working together, and it’s complicated in terms of bad communication."

"Level a. "


Q2 - 你如何定义你和SD工作室的关系？

a级别，我喜欢它，我欣赏它... ...

b级别，工作过程很复杂，尤其是... ...

c级别，我在挣扎，因为... ...

d级别，我在想象我们分手的情景（离开SD）。

调查答案：

"a级别，（我欣赏SD内部的）文化交流。"

"a级别，（我欣赏SD内部的）交流创意和美丽的幽默感。"

"c级别，我在挣扎，因为工作室不只是我。"

"b级别，我们在一起工作，这是很复杂的，因为沟通不好。"

"a级"

 

Q3 - Do you think it’s a big deal that you don't speak german while doing your project?

  • Type a. I speak german, I think it’s crucial..
  • Type b. I don't speak german but it’s crucial..
  • Type c. Language is crucial, but still workable without the common language..


"Type c. I think it helps, but this is not a provincial Village. Also approaching people does not need to meow, approaching them verbally!"

"Type b."

"Type c."

"Type b. When we are exploring or interviewing people I need German."

"Type a. If one team member knows how to speak."

Q3 - 你觉得你在做项目的时候不会说德语有什么大不了的吗？

a.我会说德语，我认为这很重要。
b. 我不会说德语，但这很重要。
c型.语言很关键，但没有语言也可以工作。

调查答案：

"c，我觉得有帮助，但这里不是农村。另外接近人也不需要“喵“（这里指非智能沟通），用语言接近他们！"

"b"

"c"

"b，当我们采访别人时，我需要德语。"

"a，如果有一个队员会说德语。"

 

Q4 - What will make you lose your faith in a SD Project?

  • Tick here if it’s about your teammate
  • Tick here if it’s not your problem
  • Tick here if you blame the society 


"No, the weather"

"The society"

"Blame society"

"It's not your problem."

" " (a new blank option)

Q4 - 什么会让你对SD项目失去信心？

如果是关于你的队友，请在这里打勾。
如果不是您的问题，请在这里打勾
如果你认为是社会的问题，请在这里打勾

调查答案：

"不，是天气"

"社会"

"责备社会"

"这不是我的问题。"

" "（一个新的空白选项）

 

Q5 - ‘This is not going to be worked’. What bothers you more about the above sentence?

  • Type a. ‘Well, then propose sth that could’ve worked’ …or maybe I would say:
  • Type b. ‘How would you know if we don't give a try’…or maybe I would say:
  • Type c. ‘We talked too much, we are following a loop that every idea is been doubting’…or maybe I would say:
  • Type d. It doesn't bothers me…or:


"type a."

"type b. Right, I'll do it."

"Type d. It doesn't bothers me…"

Q5--'这是不可能完成的工作'。你对上面这句话比较介意的是什么？

a：'那就提出可能的方案'，或者也许我会说：......。

b："如果我们不试一试，你怎么知道"，或者也许我会说：......。

c："我们说的太多了，我们在不断循环，每个想法都被驳回了"，或者也许我会说：......。

d：“不关我的事"，或者也许我会说：......。


调查答案：

"a"

"b，（"如果我们不试一试，你怎么知道"）对，我会做的。"

"d，确实不关我事..."

 

Q6 - Would swiping Right for 'Yes', Left for 'Nope' or Left bothers you?

  • It bothers.
  • Not at all, I'm an open book.
  • Politic tendency doesn't bothers me.
  • Swipe right doesn't mean it's right but it's a right.
  • What are you talking about?


"Swipe right doesn't mean it's right but it's a right."

"What are you talking about?"

"What are you talking about?"

"I don't get it."

Q6 - 向右滑动表示 "喜欢"，向左滑动表示 "不喜欢"，向左滑动（left）表示“错误“（Right政治上倾向“右“表示“正确“）会让你反思吗？

困扰。
完全不会，我是个开放的人。
政治倾向不会困扰我。
向右滑动并不意味着它是正确的，但它是一种权利。
你在说什么？

调查答案：

"向右滑动并不意味着它是正确的，但它是一种权利。"

"你在说什么？"

"你在说什么？"

"你在说什么？"

"我不懂。"

 

For adding more questions and giving answers to check our matches, please write in here:

 

 

 

Using Format